<img height="1" width="1" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192693127735055&amp;ev=PageView &amp;noscript=1">

Bisphosphonates: to stop or not to stop?

Bisphosphonates: to stop or not to stop?

The Connected Care Blog

Subscribe to stay in the know

SUBSCRIBE

Vertebral fractureBy Dr Irwin Lim, Rheumatologist

The bisphosphonates are a class of anti-osteoporosis medications which have been around for a couple of decades. Common brand names include Fosamax (Alendronate), Actonel (Risedronate) and Aclasta (Zoledronate).

They are effective and seem to also reduce the risk of death, over and above the reduction in osteoporotic fractures (see link).

But, in recent times, their use has been tainted by associations with 2 particular problems:

a) Jaw Osteonecrosis

b) Atypical Femoral Shaft fractures

These are rare complications which seem to occur after prolonged use. Expert consensus is that the benefit of using these medications far outweighs these unusual and uncommon complications.

Still, you'd want to minimise the risk, wouldn't you? As would I.

One benefit of the bisphosphonate group of medications is that the good effect on bones seem to be prolonged, and last for some variable period of time even after the medication is no longer being used.

Let's look at the 2 best trials.

The FLEX study (reference) involved following up patients who had already been treated with Alendronate for 5 years. After this initial 5 years, half the patients stopped taking the medication. The other half continued.

At the end of the 10 years, the group which had stopped the medication in the last 5 years, did see their bone density slowly drift back down (ie losing bone) to the baseline at Yr 0. In addition, there was a statistically significant but small increase in clinical spinal fractures in this group.

Therefore 5 yrs of treatment seems to almost secure 5 years of effect!

The HORIZON Extension trial (reference) followed up patients who had already been treated with Zolendronate, intravenously once yearly, for 3 yrs. After this initial 3 years, half the patients were not given any further infusions. The other half had another 3 once yearly infusions. Total of 3 vs 6.

At the end of the 6 years, the group which stopped the infusions at Yr 3, did see its bone density lower compared to the group that continued. There was a statistically significant but small increase in spinal fractures (as detected on X-rays) in the group which stopped.

To stop or not to stop? The bottom line? (read this editorial)

Depends. This is what I'd do in general (but note that a patient's specific circumstances may change this):

  • If a patient's bone mineral density still shows a femoral T-score of < -2.5 (this means still very low bone density) after 5 years of Alendronate or after 3 years of Zolendronate, I'd continue active treatment (in the absence of any side effects).
  • If a new fracture has occurred sometime during the treatment period, I would not discontinue medication therapy for osteoporosis (depending on the circumstance, choice of the actual drug may change).

Otherwise, there is an argument that can be made in stopping the drug and watching and monitoring the disease.

At some later time, when required, the medication can be reintroduced.

What's your experience with this? And, to my doctor readers, are you someone who does consider stopping?

Dr Irwin Lim is a rheumatologist and a director of BJC Health. You should follow him on twitter here.
Arthritis requires an integrated approach. We call this, Connected Care. Contact us.
This blog focuses on arthritis, healthcare in general, and Connected Care. Please subscribe to keep in touch:
Enter your email address: Delivered by FeedBurner

The Connected Care Blog

Enter your details to stay in the know, the latest articles, tips and free downloads.